Newsletter 5
    Ok, this organization has something like twelve members, nine of whom are active participants (meaning they talk to me occaisonly). That's more than some official clubs on campus, which just goes to show that people were just waiting for someone to come along and combat the Cod deviants. That someone is us. It's obvious that the time for someone to take action had come, and we are here to fulfill that duty. We are crusaders in a time of moral bleakness, lobbyists for the rights of the innocent, a veritable rightous pesticide on the moral fungus of the lawn which is our society, allowing the shrubs which are our children to grow and prosper, until the wind of age blows leaves of history against the tree trunks of time, creating an educational mulch to nourish our intellectual roots. And that basically explains it. In fact, it explains just about everything, except Spam and Rush Limbaugh. Ok, I think it's time we establish some kind of office thingy for our members. I already had a suggestion from Noah's "aquaintance" Kitty (nudge nudge wink wink say no more say no more), who felt that member OGFfish should be deemed Head Cross Dresser. I personally feel no need to contest that role, but I will understand if anyone else had their hearts set on that job, as long as they stay well away from me. I felt my title should be Grand Poobah of the Mighty FDLFDWCTT, Master of All That He Sees and Attractor of Great Hordes of Voluptuous Women, but evidently some people felt that would somehow be unfair, misleading, and long. I guess it is kind of long. So I suppose I'll be Chief (and only) Editor of the Newsletter. Please send me your thoughts on other members' positions (sitting, standing...), and what role you feel you should play. I guess that's all for now, so keep on killing that fungus of corruption, and remember, uh, remember... Dang it, I know there's something I should say at this point, but I just can't... Don't suck you feet? No. Never put carrots in your nose unless you can prove you're under the influence of a controled substance? No. Oh well. It just seems so obvious, too.